This past week we found ourselves mired in another battle with conditional probability. The initial questions were completed at a high level:

*Sally draws two cards from a standard deck without replacement. What is the probability that she draws two spades?*

Yawn... yet something is nice about the sharpness of the problem's boundaries. There is something objective--mathematical--about the task at hand. The students can count the sample space and favourable outcomes.

The question then becomes:

*Sally draws two cards from a standard deck without replacement. What is the probability that the second one is a spade?*

Breaking down the question proved difficult for the class (as it always seems to do). I gave a narrative proof, we ran experiments, developed notation, and tethered to set theory. Still, at the end of the class, the exit slip data was not good. We were a mess. I needed a way to make the problem real again.

That night I happened upon a YouTube video in a random playlist. The next morning I picked up a dozen eggs before school and spent the noon hour in the home economics lab. I had found the hook.

*Sally draws two eggs from this carton of eggs. What is the probability that the second egg is raw?*

I then asked if anyone wanted to play. When I had my volunteers, I asked one of them if they wanted to go first or second. His response--after a lengthly pause to think--was:

*First, because then I know my chances of being hit. He won't know until I'm done*

When I asked the other player if he was okay with that, he replied:

*Sure. Because if he gets hit, my chances go way down. But if he doesn't get hit, mine aren't that much worse.*

This couldn't have gone more to plan. We quickly drew up the notation and explained the conditional probability involved in the two cases explained by the volunteers.

We played the game. Eggs were smashed, videos were recorded, and snapchat stories went viral around the school. At the heart of it all was my hook--I had found the anchor problem.

NatBanting

For those of you interested, there is no advantage to going first or second. I don't do this often, but I've worked through the problem below.

H1 - Hit on the First Egg

H2 - Hit on the Second Egg

M1 - Miss on the First Egg

M2 - Miss on the Second Egg

**P(H2) = P(H1 AND H2) + P(M1 AND H2)**

(These are the two cases, each of which is conditional. I spent quite a bit of time discussing this)

P(H1) = 4/12

P(M1) = 8/12

P(H2 | H1) = 3/11

P(H2 | M1) = 4/11

P(H2 | H1) = P(H1 AND H2) / P(H1)

P(H2 | H1)*P(H1) = P(H1 AND H2)

(3/11)*(4/12) = P(H1 AND H2)

**1/11 = P(H1 AND H2)**

P(H2 | M1) = P(M1 AND H2) / P(M1)

P(H2 | M1)*P(M1) = P(M1 AND H2)

(4/11)*(8/12) = P(M1 AND H2)

**8/33 = P(M1 AND H2)**

**P(H2) = P(H1 AND H2) + P(M1 AND H2)**

P(H2) = 1/11 + 8/33

P(H2) = 3/33 + 8/33

P(H2) = 11/33

*P(H2) = 1/3*A simple calculation shows that

*as well.*

**P(H1) = 1/3**